<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel xmlns:blog="http://www.dotnetnuke.com/blog/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
    <title>Henry Kenuam</title>
    <description>Discussions about technology and events</description>
    <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/BlogId/4.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <webMaster />
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:22:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 4.1.0.0</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Debugging Tip </title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/127/Debugging-Tip.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;Recently one of my colleagues (Dukes) and I were developing a module and he is one of those guys who has memorized every keyboard shortcut for Visual Studio and I noticed him "Attaching to a Process"  (CTRL + ALT + P). Me being a traditional style developer I have always just reloaded the application using the trusty F5.  We were involved in some client specific business logic and I just made a mental note at the time.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recently, I've started using the Attach to Process (then select aspnet_wp.exe and Attach) as the way to test logic and I have to say that it is much faster than F5 even with cached authentication information and not logging in each time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are like me and you are a habitual F5er, give attach to process a try, old habits are hard to break but this one will save you a significant amount of time over the course of a day, week or your career!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/127/Debugging-Tip.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/127/Debugging-Tip.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/127/Debugging-Tip.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=127</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Team System Source Control - Get Latest on Checkout</title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/106/Team-System-Source-Control-Get-Latest-on-Checkout.aspx</link>
      <description>While in Vegas I attended a few sessions in the Architect track regards Team System future versions and in one of the sessions I learned that the next version of Team System will include a new configurable setting for Getting Lastest on Checkout. This paradigm was introduced with the first version and developers have in many cases struggled to adjust. Here are some links with more information.</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/106/Team-System-Source-Control-Get-Latest-on-Checkout.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/106/Team-System-Source-Control-Get-Latest-on-Checkout.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=106</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OpenForce07 - Las Vegas</title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/105/OpenForce07-Las-Vegas.aspx</link>
      <description>The event in Las Vegas was good to say the least, I'm suffering a bit from information overload...</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/105/OpenForce07-Las-Vegas.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/105/OpenForce07-Las-Vegas.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=105</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Membership Provider Video - Part I</title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/75/Membership-Provider-Video-Part-I.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A HREF="http://www.engagesoftware.comhttp://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/tabid/297/EntryID/41/Default.aspx"&gt;In a previous blog&lt;/A&gt; I had posted a document to help developers get started implementing their own provider. This video is aimed at helping those who have had trouble getting their environments setup correctly and issues with the web.config file. I am working on a second video that will walk through modifications required in the code. Coming soon!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.engagemodules.com/Support/Tutorials/tabid/74/Default.aspx"&gt;http://www.engagemodules.com/Support/Tutorials/tabid/74/Default.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please post any questions or comments at:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.engagemodules.com/Support/Forums/tabid/57/forumid/4/scope/threads/Default.aspx"&gt;http://www.engagemodules.com/Support/Forums/tabid/57/forumid/4/scope/threads/Default.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.engagesoftware.comhttp://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/tabid/297/EntryID/41/Default.aspx"&gt;See previous blog post here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/75/Membership-Provider-Video-Part-I.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/75/Membership-Provider-Video-Part-I.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/75/Membership-Provider-Video-Part-I.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=75</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Database Diagram doesn't work in SQL Server 2005????</title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/65/Database-Diagram-doesnt-work-in-SQL-Server-2005.aspx</link>
      <description>How many times have you upgraded a 2000 database to find that the Diagramming Feature doesn't work?  Worse yet,  you get an error that leads you down the yellow brick road to no where....</description>
      <author />
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/65/Database-Diagram-doesnt-work-in-SQL-Server-2005.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=65</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Web Deployment Projects/MSBuild to build private assemblies for DNN</title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/56/Using-Web-Deployment-Projects-MSBuild-to-build-private-assemblies-for-DNN.aspx</link>
      <description>I recently had to create a private assemblypackage for one of our modules and in doing so I ran into problems that caused me to spend a day of my life that I will never get back. I thought I would share this and possibly save someone the pain that it has caused me.</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/56/Using-Web-Deployment-Projects-MSBuild-to-build-private-assemblies-for-DNN.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/56/Using-Web-Deployment-Projects-MSBuild-to-build-private-assemblies-for-DNN.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=56</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tulsa Techfest</title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/44/Tulsa-Techfest.aspx</link>
      <description>I attended the event over the weekend and was very impressed. Great hosts and good people in Tulsa OK.</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/44/Tulsa-Techfest.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/44/Tulsa-Techfest.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=44</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Building your own Membership Provider for DotNetNuke and ASP.NET 2.0</title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/41/Building-your-own-Membership-Provider-for-DotNetNuke-and-ASP-NET-2-0.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I decided to create a document that would help developers get started  building a new Membership Provider for DNN. If you are looking for a good place to get started this is the place.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/41/Building-your-own-Membership-Provider-for-DotNetNuke-and-ASP-NET-2-0.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/41/Building-your-own-Membership-Provider-for-DotNetNuke-and-ASP-NET-2-0.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=41</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft VS Team for Database Professionals</title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/39/Microsoft-VS-Team-for-Database-Professionals.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With little fanfare, Microsoft released a killer app for database developers: Microsoft Visual Studio Team Edition for Database Professionals. Check out the quick 5 minute video on Channel 9... &lt;A href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=235260"&gt;http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=235260&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/39/Microsoft-VS-Team-for-Database-Professionals.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/39/Microsoft-VS-Team-for-Database-Professionals.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/39/Microsoft-VS-Team-for-Database-Professionals.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=39</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deploying ASP.NET 2.0 web services with AJAX</title>
      <link>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/37/Deploying-ASP-NET-2-0-web-services-with-AJAX.aspx</link>
      <description>Here's an interesting thing we discovered when deploying an ASP.Net 2.0 site using AJAX calls (using HTTP POST).   In order to enable HTTP POST's for your web service you have to modify the web.config file to add the following:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff size=2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#800000 size=2&gt;WEBSERVICES&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff size=2&gt;&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#800000 size=2&gt;PROTOCOLS&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff size=2&gt;&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#800000 size=2&gt;ADD&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff size=2&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#ff0000 size=2&gt;name&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff size=2&gt;=&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff size=2&gt;HttpPost&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff size=2&gt; /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#800000 size=2&gt;PROTOCOLS&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff size=2&gt;&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#800000 size=2&gt;WEBSERVICES&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff size=2&gt;&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR&gt;(&lt;B&gt;NOTE&lt;/B&gt;: if you are using SOAP or GET calls there are add parameters for those as well  (&lt;ADD name="HttpSoap" /&gt; &lt;ADD name="HttpPost" /&gt;).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I don't recall having to make these changes for .Net 1.1.  Also, it's easy to get tricked here because it works in development environments. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/37/Deploying-ASP-NET-2-0-web-services-with-AJAX.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/37/Deploying-ASP-NET-2-0-web-services-with-AJAX.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engagesoftware.com/Blog/EntryId/37/Deploying-ASP-NET-2-0-web-services-with-AJAX.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engagesoftware.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=37</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
